|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 481
|
The regulations require that the manifest information of the transferring incoming "carrier". But as with many other regulations, the term "carrier" defined not by the CBP specificity. CBP has only said that the opinion Carrier as "the unit that controls the transmission." We have the CBP in touch In this regard, and at the time of this writing, the agency will not clarify this Defined in every detail. It is CBP's current position that the interested Parties have to work, the meaning of the term among themselves as and / or on your own. At first glance this definition seems to show that CBP is View of the head owner, charterer or operator of the ship for the AMS Submissions. However, if the head of the owner, charterer or operator of the Ship is the instance that is the question of lading, it is obvious that none of these People who have the necessary information for submitting required under the new Regulations. The CBP regulations do reference, in several cases, the term "Operator." Such a link would seem to indicate that the company considered under the CBP regulations is the equivalent of the "ocean common Carrier "under the Federal Maritime Commission regulations. 12 In addition, the CBP regulations and interpretative documents refer to the carrier as party "with operational control of the ship." Accordingly, our opinion is that CBP is accepting submissions from the AMS unit, which Threads of the ocean bill of lading on the ship and operates the ship, or, in the case of slot sharing agreements, the operator of the ship, who under the operating agreement for the consolidation of the necessary Information and the issuance of the cargo manifest for the ship's theme. This view is both with CBP interpretation of the support as the company that controls the transport and the practical necessity of the issuer of the invoice of lading that the company with the necessary information. (Although CBP has not issued any further interpretations on this subject since the publication |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| automatic, carrier, definition, filing, manifest |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Automated manifest information required to be submitted electronically (U.S.) | admin | US & Canada | 0 | 09-16-2011 06:15 AM |
| Automatic Manifest Filing Submission periods (U.S.) | admin | US & Canada | 0 | 09-16-2011 06:12 AM |
| How to interpret the "Notice of Customs Clearance for International Mail" and related procedures (JAPAN) | admin | JAPAN | 0 | 12-07-2010 03:44 AM |
| What are the importer's obligations when filing a Carnet? | admin | US & Canada | 0 | 04-28-2010 12:25 PM |
| What is an "Importer Number?" | admin | US & Canada | 0 | 04-17-2010 14:33 PM |